A Platform For News, Tech Tricks and whatsapp group links.
Here we listed 10 most Disappointing movies of 2019. With so many movies being released each year, it shouldn’t shock anyone to hear that plenty of them disappoint. This is especially true when you think about how often Hollywood tries to reinvigorate franchises that are near and dear to people’s hearts. Put simply, not every movie is going to be a winner.
It’s not just big franchises though. Any movie is capable of disappointing. It just needs to show some signs of potential. That’s more or less the criteria for this list. If the movie shows any promise, it will be included. If it seems dead on arrival, as is the case with Hellboy and Shaft, then it will be not be included.
The movies below are not necessarily bad. Some of them are perfectly watchable. The issue is simply that they didn’t live up to the promise.They’ll be ranked in order of how disappointing they are rather than how bad they are. If a movie showed a lot of potential before crashing and burning, then it’ll be near the top. With those brief explanations out of the way, the top ten will be listed below.
The Intouchables was a phenomenon when it came out back in 2011. Earning almost $450 million at the worldwide box office, this was a movie that people flocked to see, and for good reason. It was a little hokey, but it had a feel-good message at its center that made people feel hopeful.
This kind of strong reaction among viewers inevitably resulted in a Hollywood remake starring Bryan Cranston and Kevin Hart. People weren’t exactly clamoring for a remake, but it’s still a shame they couldn’t pull off something that came close to rivaling the original.
The Intouchables has its own problems, but at least it feels genuine. The Upside sort of just goes through the motions. It spends a lot of time recreating the scenes from the original film, which means that a good chunk of the movie feels pointless.
Meanwhile, added scenes tend to add next to nothing. They only add to the predictability of an already predictable story. We’ve all seen this before, and we’ve seen it done better. The Fundamentals of Caring, The Sessions, and (of course) The Intouchables all tell the same story. They just happen to know how to tell the story in an engaging way.
Overall, The Upside’s biggest problem is its inability to justify its existence. It takes most of what we saw in The Intouchables and makes it dull. Two strong performances aren’t enough to save a movie that’s overly sentimental and frustratingly conventional. Sure, some of its problems come as a direct result of its predecessor’s mistakes, but at least that movie had some heart.
Listen, a slasher superhero movie has a lot of potential, but Brightburn doesn’t live up to that potential. Unlike a lot of movies on this list, it’s never boring. In fact, it’s pretty damn entertaining from start to finish. It’s just not smart or inventive, and it could’ve been in the right hands. Instead, it’s 91 minutes of a pissed off kid killing helpless people. For some, that’s probably enough. Others will definitely be looking for something deeper.
As much as Brightburn wants people to believe otherwise, it is a really straightforward slasher movie. Sure, the antagonist has superpowers, but that’s about the only difference. Otherwise, there’s not a whole lot that allows this movie to stick out from Halloween or Friday the 13th. Considering the fact that slasher movies are often considered the lowest form of horror, this may be a warning sign to some people.
The kills are brutal and fun to watch, but that’s about it. The story is incredibly barebones, which is a shame because there’s a lot of potential here. If they would’ve delved deeper into the character’s psyche, things may have been a little more captivating. The folks behind the camera instead decided to go for straight blood and gore. This approach is adequate, but Brightburn is a movie that really could have been more than adequate.
This is a frustrating one because of how quickly reviews dipped. Following its first screening, Pet Sematary reviews were glowing. People were calling it one of the best Stephen King adaptations ever made. Basically, the Rotten Tomatoes score started high before it plummeted. Maybe the first round of critics saw a different movie than everyone else because the current Rotten Tomatoes score is probably appropriate. most Disappointing movies.
Pet Sematary is not a top-tier Stephen King adaptation. It doesn’t reach the highs of It, Carrie, or the Shining. It also doesn’t come close to approaching the quality of the more dramatic adaptations like Stand by Me and The Green Mile. It’s certainly better than a lot of other King movies, but so is slamming your foot in a steel door.
This take on the classic novel doesn’t offer anything that couldn’t be found in the original movie, and that wasn’t a great movie to start. It’s not a beat-for-beat remake. In fact, it makes a lot of changes, but these changes aren’t really meaningful. They don’t do anything to help the movie stick out in any worthwhile way. It feels a lot less silly than the original, but that could just be because we have the technology to make it work. It’s still an uninspired trudge through familiar territory.
In the introduction, there was talk about how not every movie on this list is bad. Pet Sematary is an example. It’s not bad; it’s just monotonous. It feels rather soulless compared to countless other horror movies. When movies like Us and Midsommar exist, this one just can’t compete. One of the most Disappointing movies.
A good chunk of the live action Disney remakes stick dangerously close to the original story. Movies like Beauty and the Beast and Cinderella were visually impressive, but they seemed scared to take any kind of risk. This approach to filmmaking resulted in movies that were fine but unnecessary.
It would have been a lot harder for Tim Burton’s Dumbo to pull that off considering the original’s 64-minute runtime. Burton and company had to make some changes to the story so that modern audiences would get a more cohesive and epic story in-line with what they had come to expect.
An expanded Dumbo sounds like a great idea in theory, but Burton never quite sticks the landing. This is probably due to the fact that there isn’t enough content to fill the sub-two hour runtime.
In an effort to keep things grounded, human characters replace the anthropomorphic animals from the original. While all of the actors give strong performances, the writing does very little to make these characters interesting.
New characters are constantly being introduced, but they only exist to move an incredibly thin story forward. Dumbo isn’t a complex story, so it shouldn’t be surprising to hear that this inflated take on a timeless tale tends to feel bloated. Perhaps Walt Disney had the right idea when he claimed “you can stretch a story just so far and after that it won’t hold together”
There are some eye-catching scenes scattered throughout the movie, but “scattered” is the key word. Viewers have to sit through large sections of dull exposition and unnecessary dialogue in order to catch some of the more engaging scenes. Watching the beautifully animated elephant take flight for the first time is breathtaking, but there’s a cost. Most people won’t want to sit through the boredom just to see a few standout moments, and honestly, who can blame them?
Hollywood has a hit-or-miss track record when it comes to biographical serial killer movies. Monster is cinematic gold, Gacy is an abomination, and Summer of Sam is somewhere in-between. In theory, the track record should be a little more consistent when you consider the subject matter, but that’s sadly not the case. most Disappointing movies.
Serial killers are inherently interesting, so interesting movies should follow, but that’s not what happens. Writers and directors tend to focus on the wrong things. If they focus on the right things, they sometimes do so in a way that’s bland in repetitive. Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile gives viewers a visualized Wikipedia entry about Ted Bundy that feels both generic and uninformative.
This is especially true when you consider the fact that the director also created a documentary feature that outlines the same exact details. It doesn’t have the same Hollywood flair, but it certainly tells the same story. Yes, documentaries and narrative films are two different mediums, but why can’t this narrative film offer something a little different? It’s not just that it covers the same ground as the documentary. It covers the same ground as countless other movies.
It’d be easy to take that argument and claim that it’s unfair. After all, isn’t the director just telling Ted Bundy’s story? Maybe his life is just one big serial killer cliché! That certainly would be fair if the director didn’t take so many been-there-done-that liberties. He skews the story so that it’s much more in-line with what viewers allegedly want to see, but this ultimately results in a most Disappointing movies that feels cheap and uninspired. On no. 6 of Most Disappointing Movies.
Most people considered Split to be Shyamalan’s big comeback. Yeah, The Visit was fun, but Split was a Shyamalan movie that really wowed viewers for the first time in years. It’s no surprise that this big comeback resulted in a sequel that brought together characters from Split and Unbreakable, two of Shyamalan’s best movies. The horror was turned down in favor of a more traditional superhero story with psychological elements. On no. 5 of Most Disappointing Movies.
There’s a difference between Glass and other movies about people with superpowers. Most superhero movies feature thrilling action scenes and expensive set pieces. Glass is more interested in dialogue, and that would’ve been perfectly fine if that dialogue was any interesting.
Unfortunately, we get very little insight into these characters that we didn’t already know, which is ironic when you consider the fact that they’re being psychoanalyzed. Sure, some loose ends are tied up here and there, but none of this feels necessary. Shyamalan focuses on all the wrong things which makes for a dull viewing experience.
To make matters worse, theaters are oversaturated with superhero movies and Glass doesn’t offer anything particularly groundbreaking. It’s definitely darker, but that PG-13 rating ensures that it’s still relatively safe. Once again, there’s definitely more dialogue, but at the end of the day this is still a movie with a generic message. You could argue that it doesn’t need a message if it’s entertaining, but it’s not exactly entertaining either.
On the bright side, it’s far from the worst movie on this list. McAvoy gives an incredible performance, some of the individual scenes are thrilling, and a couple twists and turns prove to be unpredictable. Glass just falls apart when viewed as a whole movie. Certain parts definitely work, but it can’t help but feel like a misfire.
J. R. R. Tolkien may have been an interesting person, but it’s hard to tell after watching this recent biopic. Nicholas Hoult may be a skilled actor, but it’s hard to tell after watching this recent biopic. Let’s put it this way: there’s a lot about Tolkien that looks great on paper, but Dome Karukoski and company miss the mark big time. On no. 4 of Most Disappointing Movies.
It’s really easy to get excited about biopics because they have a sort of pedigree. Statistically speaking, they’re more often good than bad. Capote, Love & Mercy, Raging Bull, Gandhi, Catch Me If You Can and countless other masterpieces have made it so that it’s easy to just assume most movies in this genre will impress.
Tolkien is, unfortunately, an example of a bad biopic. It’s not bad in a unique way though. Honestly, Tolkien commits a lot of the same “crimes” as other bad movies in the genre. Mainly, it’s uninteresting and it lacks valuable information.
There’s nothing in this movie that can’t be found online. It’s as though the writers found one article about the titular author and made a movie about it. Actually, it’s surprising how much is left out about the author that could’ve been included. This is a bare-bones look into a person who actually has some really interesting characteristics. It seems as though everyone involved was scared to include anything remotely complex.
Because of this, the movie is painfully uninteresting. It checks off a series of boxes and then rolls the credits. There’s no passion here, and there really should be considering the fact that so many people adore the work of J. R. R. Tolkien. Maybe the crew involved with this movie don’t feel the same way.
On no. 3 of Most Disappointing Movies. The nicest thing that can be said about MIB: International is that it’s not as bad as critics claim. It tells a perfectly coherent story led by two stars who have a reasonable amount of chemistry. It is a functional movie, and that can’t be said about everything that has come out this year. Too bad it’s such a slog.
Again, Men in Black: International isn’t a narrative mess by any means. It’s all just rather meaningless due to the fact that it recycles so many elements from the other films in the franchise. That may be giving it too much credit. Frankly, it recycles elements from countless films in general. There isn’t an original bone in this movie’s body. It’s a boring sci-fi experience that offers about as much substance as a sunflower seed.
To add to that, the jokes are inconsistent at best. Chris Hemsworth plays the same overly confident dumb guy he’s played time and time again. It was funny the first few times, but it’s beginning to get stale. Tessa Thompson, on the other hand, is made to play a straight-laced character so she doesn’t get much of a chance to show off her comedic chops. The characters are all archetypes, and unfortunately the jokes all come as a direct result of that.
Men in Black: International is the reason people are claiming Hollywood is out of ideas. There are movies that prove otherwise, but when the heavily-marketed movies turn out to be like this, it’s easy to understand why people have become frustrated. It’s unfair to bash the state of movies as a whole, but this particular movie doesn’t paint a great picture.
People will defend Godzilla movies until their last breath by saying that it’s all about the monsters, so the human characters don’t matter. Here’s the thing though: if you’re going to include a massive ensemble cast, you better make sure the characters are interesting. Cool kaiju battles don’t make up for weak characters that make the movie a slog, and that’s why Godzilla: King of the Monsters is such a disappointment. on number 2 of Most Disappointing Movies.
The action scenes are thrilling, but you have to wade through so much uninteresting dialogue to get there. It’s not like the acting is bad. Godzilla: King of the Monsters has a terrific cast, but the cast members are given nothing interesting to do. In terms of popularity, Millie Bobby Brown is at the top of her game, but she can’t save a movie with such drab writing.
Visual effects and grandiose action can only get a movie so far; just ask Roland Emmerich. The main point of the movie may be big bad monsters, but that doesn’t excuse the fact that there are so many human characters doing so many boring things.
If kaiju movies are really about the monsters, the human characters should take a backseat. In this movie, they don’t. They’re constantly taking the spotlight away from the big baddies. Yes, the fact that they can speak helps them help establish the story, but they desperately need to do a better job.
The MonsterVerse was 2 for 2 this year, so it was easy to get excited for this one. Sadly, this is a massive step down from both of the previous monster movies. 2014’s Godzilla had similar issues with uninteresting characters, but at least it wasn’t jam-packed with dull exposition. Let’s all pray that everybody learned their lesson this time around.
Okay, sure, Dark Phoenix had its fair share of warning signs. Delays and alleged behind-the-scenes squabbles didn’t paint a pretty picture prior to this movie’s release, but Jean Grey’s downward spiral is iconic, so it was best to stay cautiously optimistic. X-Men fans may be happy about the Disney takeover, but it still seemed silly to root against the “final” movie in a really solid series.
When the movie came out, it was ripped apart by critics and fans alike. The opening half-hour is promising, but as time progresses, the film gets sillier and sillier until a finale that falls flat on its face. Put simply, this is not how fans wanted this series to end.
Sophie Turner does a fine job, but the writing does her no favors. A majority of the movie is devoted to watching her cause as much chaos as possible, but unlike Brightburn, the scenes aren’t particularly well-choreographed. Instead, they’re just typical X-Men hooplah with a significantly whinier character.
There are also several subplots that detract from the central story, but with a story this thin, it almost seems like some kind of padding needed to be included. This is just the wrong kind of padding. We’re given unnecessary scene after unnecessary scene in-between shots of Jean Grey trying to murder her friends and family. It makes the overall movie feel like a jumbled mess.
Of course, that’s because the movie is a jumbled mess. Dark Phoenix isn’t X-Men Origins bad, but it’s a far cry from Days of Future Past. We’ve been spoiled with great superhero movies lately, so this feels like a slap in the face. This series should have ended better, but this is what we got.
Comment below the name of the movie you want to include in list of most Disappointing movies of 2019.
How to fix PUBG Unknown Error: PUBG is not just a game, but it is a source of addiction. This game… Read More
So, can you make money from blogging? How do bloggers make money? It’s no secret that many blogs earn as much as… Read More